@scoreman:
you are not labeled as "a cheat", you are labeled for using engine help in rated correspondence games altough it is not allowed. According to your statement this happened due to a misunderstanding from your side, so maybe you will get another chance. But besides that this case is totally clear.
What I dont like is that you are claiming that everyone is using engines in correspondence - I dont like such an attitude.
I played a few correspondence games as well (still some in progress) and I would be angry if my opponents would use an engine. Either it is officially allowed or not.
You reached a really high correspondence rating of 2600+ by beating allot of "unarmed" players and I think you should take this into consideration as well and not just looking for some cheap excuses.
Best wishes
Nada
you are not labeled as "a cheat", you are labeled for using engine help in rated correspondence games altough it is not allowed. According to your statement this happened due to a misunderstanding from your side, so maybe you will get another chance. But besides that this case is totally clear.
What I dont like is that you are claiming that everyone is using engines in correspondence - I dont like such an attitude.
I played a few correspondence games as well (still some in progress) and I would be angry if my opponents would use an engine. Either it is officially allowed or not.
You reached a really high correspondence rating of 2600+ by beating allot of "unarmed" players and I think you should take this into consideration as well and not just looking for some cheap excuses.
Best wishes
Nada