Well @Sarg0n, I’m drastically overrated, I feel like I should be an 800…
1800 if you want an estimate.
But you are a junior so it could be either higher or lower.
And official ratings will take a while to return to some level of inaccuracy given the pandemic, and the way many juniors have improved a lot from a year with little formal school but have had no OTB tournaments for their rating to catch up.
But you are a junior so it could be either higher or lower.
And official ratings will take a while to return to some level of inaccuracy given the pandemic, and the way many juniors have improved a lot from a year with little formal school but have had no OTB tournaments for their rating to catch up.
<Comment deleted by user>
<Comment deleted by user>
In India, everyone and their cousin is in the 1100-1300 range😂
@TheOnlyChessCheetah
It depends on your ability to concentrate in long games : if you can concentrate well, then around 1800, else anything u1800 is possible.
It depends on your ability to concentrate in long games : if you can concentrate well, then around 1800, else anything u1800 is possible.
Hello
Fide std. ELO vs Lichess Blitz rating :
http://cpcleague.fr/IMG/png/fidevsblitz.png
and
http://cpcleague.fr/IMG/png/lichess_blitz_vs_fide_classical.png
Fide std. ELO vs Lichess Blitz rating :
http://cpcleague.fr/IMG/png/fidevsblitz.png
and
http://cpcleague.fr/IMG/png/lichess_blitz_vs_fide_classical.png
79% of your Elo + 564 is not a bad estimation for me (see graphic 2).
79% of your Elo + 564 multiplied by the average radius of earth multiplayed by number of chess playing humans and the number of games played on lichess is not a bad estimation.
@Sarg0n I'm going to go ahead and disagree with that linear regression.
2200*.79 + 564 = 2302. There's no way a 2200 lichess blitz player is 2300...
2200*.79 + 564 = 2302. There's no way a 2200 lichess blitz player is 2300...
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.