Preface: Yes, I know you can just add inaccuracies and multiply the average, but at a glance it would be nice, even as an optional setting.
Average centipawn loss is a cool metric to sees who's mistakes were usually larger, but it doesn't give an accurate at a glance picture of who played a more solid / accurate game. One big mistake can be lost among 10 .1 inaccuracies.
Sum centipawn loss would also be a nice self check metric to gauge progression. ie. "I used to make 5 pawns worth of mistakes a game, this month I'm giving up 4."
Note that I'm still only suggesting using the same data that the AVG los metric uses, not every minute change in score. Just your inaccuracies/mistakes.
Thoughts? Feelings? Reasons why I'm dumb? Thanks.
p.s. Lichess is awesome, and I love you guys for building it.
Average centipawn loss is a cool metric to sees who's mistakes were usually larger, but it doesn't give an accurate at a glance picture of who played a more solid / accurate game. One big mistake can be lost among 10 .1 inaccuracies.
Sum centipawn loss would also be a nice self check metric to gauge progression. ie. "I used to make 5 pawns worth of mistakes a game, this month I'm giving up 4."
Note that I'm still only suggesting using the same data that the AVG los metric uses, not every minute change in score. Just your inaccuracies/mistakes.
Thoughts? Feelings? Reasons why I'm dumb? Thanks.
p.s. Lichess is awesome, and I love you guys for building it.