| Lichess Feedback - Training 2207 blunders on queen?#1 https://nb.lichess.org/training/2207 I find it a bit silly, at least on this level, that I should count on the opponent making a mistake like this. A better move (after Ne5) would be Qd2 or Qd1. | the_black_knight |
| General Chess Discussion - Teach me to play better #2 1: https://nb.lichess.org/training/opening/ 2/3: https://nb.lichess.org/training (and study games, i guess) <3 | the_black_knight |
| Lichess Feedback - Cheater !#6 I like mirrors but this was a sudden scare! | the_black_knight |
| Lichess Feedback - I'm confused by this problem.#3 Using chrome? https://www.wiknix.com/how-to-fix-dns-probe-finished-no-internet-in-chrome/ | the_black_knight |
| General Chess Discussion - Can double pawns be a "strong solution"?#5 @achja #3 OK. Thanks :) | the_black_knight |
| General Chess Discussion - Can double pawns be a "strong solution"?#4 Yes, Bxf3 I can easily understand. Double pawns = bad is what I've learned. Why would I want it? Bf4 / Bg5 would be a better second solution to the opening moves. | the_black_knight |
| General Chess Discussion - Can double pawns be a "strong solution"?#1 http://nb.lichess.org/training/opening/13978 With this pawn structure, how can gxf3 be a good solution to this opening? | the_black_knight |